King v. Coffee
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.
The first subject for consideration on this appeal involves an interpretation of a partition deed between the heirs of Robert King. The rules which control the court in this respect are well settled by our eases.
One of the late cases, Long v. Holden, 216 Ala. 81, 112 So. 444, 446, 52 A. L. R. 536, expresses many of such rules. To repeat briefly: The conveyance must be so interpreted as to give effect to the intention of the parties, as manifested by its language, when the whole instrument is taken together, in connection with the subject-matter and surrounding circumstances. When so…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Chamberlain v. GaillardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1855
- Castleberry v. StringerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Tankersly v. PettisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
- Webb v. MullinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
- McCall v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Darden v. MeadowsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- McKleroy v. DishmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Irwin v. BaggettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Ex Parte ProctorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
- Adams v. PowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.