Austin v. Stephen
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke
These parties appear here in the same order as in the trial court. Plaintiff in error is hereinafter referred to as Austin and defendant in error Sadie E. Stephen as Stephen. The interest, if any, of the other defendant in error does not appear, hence he is not further noticed.
Austin had title to, and possession of, certain lots in Denver. She and Stephen entered into a contract, hereinafter denominated “A,” which the latter placed of record. Austin brought this action to quiet her title against the claims of Stephen under that contract. The cause was tried to the court on an agneed statement…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Sample v. RomineMississippi Supreme Court · 1942
- Cook v. Tide Water Associated Oil CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
- A. Alex Shuford, Jr. v. Roy G. Anderson, and Currier & Carlsen, Incorporated, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
- Lindsay v. MarcusSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
- Kincaid v. MillerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.