Legal Opinion

Peters v. Johnson, Jackson & Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1902PublishedCited by 30 opinions

From Circuit Court Ritchie County. Action by L. J. Peters against Johnson, Jackson & Co. Judgment for defendants. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

BraNNON, Judge:

This is an action of trespass on the ease brought in the circuit court of Ritchie County by L. J. Peters against the firm of Johnson, Jackson & Co. The declaration alleges that the defendants sold to the plaintiff through his agent by mistake salt-petre for epsom salts, and that the plaintiff having taken the saltpetre, believing it to be epsom salts, became sick and suffered great impairment of health. The jury in the case found for the defendants.

One error relied upon is that the verdict reads, “We the jury find for the defendants,” whereas it ought to read, “we the jury find…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Savings Bank v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Devlin v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  3. Coughtry v. . Globe Woolen Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
  4. Wellington v. Downer Kerosene Oil Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  5. Norton v. SewallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Morningstar v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Huset v. J. I. Case Threshing Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  3. Crum v. WardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Crigger v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  5. O'Brien v. American Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API