Legal Opinion

Hull v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 31, 1987No. 86AP-847PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReilly, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas granting summary judgment to appellee Board of Trustees of Pleasant Township (“Pleasant Township”) and dismissing it as a party in the action.

This action involves an automobile-train accident which occurred at the intersection of State Route 665 and the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company crossing in Pleasant Township, Ohio. The trial court held that Pleasant Township was entitled to the defense of sovereign immunity and that it had no duty to maintain the B&O Railroad crossing at State Route 665. Appellants…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Enghauser Manufacturing Co. v. Eriksson Engineering Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Strohofer v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Royce v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  4. C&D Partnership v. City of GahannaOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Mathis v. Cleveland Public LibraryOhio Supreme Court · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Archon v. Union Pacific RRSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
  2. Howe v. Jackson Twp. Bd. of TrusteesOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Scanlon v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API