Legal Opinion

Livingston v. Pugsley

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 12, 1916PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Clay Chancery Court, Western District, Chas. D. Frierson, Chancellor; • 1. The mortgage did not cover individual indebtedness. This was a joint contract; a unilateral contract, and Pugsley could not sue alone. .Kirby’s Digest, § § 4420, 6010; 27 Cye. 1044, C; lb. 1564, b; 8 Id. 88 v;'l5 Ene. PI. & Pr. 528; 9 Cye.. 655, 656, note 40; 5 A. & E. Enc.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Clay Chancery Court, Western District, Chas. D. Frierson, Chancellor; • 1. The mortgage did not cover individual indebtedness. This was a joint contract; a unilateral contract, and Pugsley could not sue alone. .Kirby’s Digest, § § 4420, 6010; 27 Cye. 1044, C; lb. 1564, b; 8 Id. 88 v;'l5 Ene. PI. & Pr. 528; 9 Cye.. 655, 656, note 40; 5 A. & E. Enc. Law, 956 (5), b; 67‘Ark. 27; 93 Id. 447; 91 Id. 10. 2. Parol evidence was inadmissible to show that the mortgage was given to secure an individual debt. 17 Cyc. 567, 586, 627, 708; 66 Ark. 393; 95 Id. 131; lb. 458. 3. Tlie former…

1Opinion of the CourtMcCulloch, C. J.

This is an action instituted at law originally by appellee against appellants to recover possession -of certain personal property for the purpose of foreclosing a chattel mortgage executed by appellants, and on motion of appellants the cause was transferred to the chancery court and -there proceeded to a final decree in appellee’s favor- foreclosing the mortgage.

Appellee was a - merchant engaged in business at Knobel, Clay County,- Arkansas, and appellants were farmers living in that vicinity. Appellants rented land from J. N. Sutton and they ran an account with appellee for supplies…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pulaski County v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  2. Fourche River Lumber Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  3. McCombs v. WallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1899
  4. Fogel v. ButlerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  5. Moore v. TerrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1899

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gordon v. ClarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  2. Andrews v. Victor Metal Products Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
  3. Seelig v. Phillips CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  4. Goodwin v. BakerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  5. Mays v. BarnettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API