Legal Opinion
Domenick v. Wilbert Burial Vault Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 16, 1962PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, C. J.
In this appeal, the plaintiffs have pursued in brief and oral argument only the errors assigned in the finding and the charge to the jury. Other errors assigned are considered as having been abandoned. Maltbie, Conn. App. Proc. §§ 167, 327. Certain additions to the finding which are supported by the evidence and are material to a consideration of the plaintiffs’ claims of error in the charge have been made. Castaldo v. D’Eramo, 140 Conn. 88, 93, 98 A.2d 664; Maltbie, op. cit. § 160.
The plaintiffs’ claims of proof, as thus corrected, may be stated in summary as follows: About noontime on…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Secondino v. New Haven Gas Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Salvatore v. HaydenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- Castaldo v. D'ERAMOSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Borsoi v. SparicoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- D'Addario v. American Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. MarianoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- Gigliotti v. United Illuminating Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- State v. HawthorneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Michaud v. GagneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Kelly v. BlissSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.