Legal Opinion
Buergofol GmbH v. Omega Liner Company, Inc.
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided June 21, 2023No. 4:22-cv-04112Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION BUERGOFOL GMBH, 4:22-CV-04112-KES Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND vs. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS AND DENYING MOTION FOR MORE OMEGA LINER COMPANY, INC., DEFINITE STATEMENT Defendant. Plaintiff, Buergofol GmbH, alleges that defendant, Omega Liner Company, Inc., is infringing two of its patents – the ‘882 Patent and the ‘269 Patent. Docket 1. Omega initially moved to dismiss both claims of infringement under Rule 12(b)(6), but later withdrew its motion as to the ‘882 Patent. Dockets 15, 16; Docket 26 at 4.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Braden v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Miller v. Redwood Toxicology Laboratory, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Nalco Company v. Chem-Mod, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.