Legal Opinion

Means v. Marshall

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 5, 1948No. 13866PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOND, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from an order overruling appellant’s plea of privilege timely filed to be sued in the county of his residence ; the venue issue involving the application of Subdv. 4, Art. 1995, R.C.S.

Appellee instituted this suit in Dallas County against Brown & Ross, Inc., resi*606dent of said county, and seven other nonresident defendants, one of whom was appellant J. C. Means, Jr., residing in Jefferson County. To maintain the suit against the nonresident defendants, under the applicable venue statute, plaintiff alleged in his petition, brought forward in his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stockyards National Bank v. MaplesTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Richardson v. Kelly, Recr.Texas Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Richardson v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wedegartner v. SkoruppaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  2. Knox v. McMillanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  3. Means v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  4. Knox v. McMillanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API