Means v. Marshall
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
BOND, Chief Justice.
This suit arose out of a joint reciprocal insurance engagement in which the appellant, with a large number of others, among whom was the defendant Brown & Ross, Inc., each bound themselves to indemnify the others and one another against losses and hazards described in the insurance policy or policies issued to each of them; and each and all of the subscribers bound and obligated themselves for payment of his, or its, pro rata portion of indemnity granted by the subscribers of said association, including all expenses incurred, which obligations and undertakings of each of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stockyards National Bank v. MaplesTexas Supreme Court · 1936
- Richardson v. Kelly, Recr.Texas Supreme Court · 1945
- Brown v. PetersTexas Supreme Court · 1936
- Richardson v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
- Funderburg v. Southwestern Drug Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Borrego v. Del PalacioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Tyson v. ASSOCIATES INVESTMENT COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
- Tyson v. ASSOCIATES INVESTMENT COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959