Legal Opinion
Amica Mutual Insurance v. Fogel
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 8, 2011No. 10-3611Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
AMBRO, Circuit Judge.
The principal issue in this case is whether New Jersey or Pennsylvania law applies to an automobile insurance dispute between Arnica Mutual Insurance Company (“Arnica”) and Edward and Maureen Fogel, individually and as guardians ad litem of Marcy Fogel and Carrie Fogel, and as administrators of the estate of Melissa Fogel (collectively, the “Fogels”). Arnica issued the policy to the Fogels when they were residents of New Jersey. During its term, the Fogels moved to Pennsylvania, and made Arnica aware of their permanent relocation, before they were…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Terletsky v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Ferens v. John Deere Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Dona W. Horowitz, Individually and as Co-Executrix of the Estate of Leonard N. Horowitz, Deceased Alfred Camner, Co-Executor of the Estate of Leonard N. Horowitz, Deceased v. Federal Kemper Life Assurance Company, in No. 94-1900. Dona W. Horowitz, Individually and as Co-Executrix of the Estate of Leonard N. Horowitz, Deceased Alfred Camner, Co-Executor of the Estate of Leonard N. Horowitz, Deceased, in No. 94-1901 v. Federal Kemper Life Assurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.