Legal Opinion

Litva v. Village of Richmond

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 29, 2007No. 05-JE-26PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Donofrio, Judge.

{¶ 1} Plaintiffs-appellants and cross-appellees, Ronald Swiger, Mildred Rowland, and John and Theresa Litva, appeal from a Jefferson County Common Pleas Court decision granting summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee and cross-appellant, the village of Richmond. The court held that disputed village ordinances are “valid and enforceable.”

{¶ 2} Appellants own property in Richmond, Ohio. The Litvas keep horses on their property for breeding, training, and giving riding lessons. Swiger and Rowland raise donkeys, goats, and chickens on their property and use the animals as…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Palazzolo v. Rhode IslandSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. State ex rel. R.T.G., Inc. v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Hooten v. Safe Auto InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State ex rel. R.T.G., Inc. v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Adams v. WardOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Harris v. RossiOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Swartz v. HouseholderOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Wedemeyer v. U.S.S. F.D.R. (CV-42) Reunion Assn.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Taylor v. Belmont Community Hosp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API