Legal Opinion · Dissent

Chournos v. Evona Inv. Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1939No. 6092Published

1Dissent

McDonough, justice.

I dissent. The court found that the Kellers “worked and planned together to obtain a deed for Lloyd W. Keller, to said premises and said Kellers were jointly interested in the funds paid as consideration for said deed * * * that they planned and schemed together” to that end. Neither of the Kellers stand in a better position than would L. L. Keller had he purchased outright in his own name. The problem presented then is that of the cotenant of a lease-hold purchasing the outstanding title, with the additional fact that by such purchase and under the circumstances here he…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Malone v. YoungSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  2. Gilb v. O'NeillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  3. Hodgson v. Federal Oil & Development Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Kievman v. GreversSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  5. Ruthrauff v. Silver King Western Min. & Mill. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API