People v. Ermo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Suozzi, J.
The issue to be decided on this appeal is whether defendant’s waiver of counsel during his questioning on a murder charge was invalid due to the absence of counsel who had been assigned to represent defendant on a separate assault charge.
THE FACTS
Defendant, an 18-year-old with a mild degree of mental retardation, stands convicted of murdering a young girl, one Ursula Schiba, in Poughkeepsie on August 3, 1971, during the commission of the crime of sexual abuse. The conviction was, to a large extent, based upon a series of inculpatory statements that defendant gave…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. HobsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. ArthurNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- People v. AlmesticaNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. ErmoNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- In re SchaeferNew York City Family Court · 1978