Legal Opinion

People v. Ermo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 30, 1978PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Suozzi, J.

The issue to be decided on this appeal is whether defendant’s waiver of counsel during his questioning on a murder charge was invalid due to the absence of counsel who had been assigned to represent defendant on a separate assault charge.

THE FACTS

Defendant, an 18-year-old with a mild degree of mental retardation, stands convicted of murdering a young girl, one Ursula Schiba, in Poughkeepsie on August 3, 1971, during the commission of the crime of sexual abuse. The conviction was, to a large extent, based upon a series of inculpatory statements that defendant gave…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. People v. HobsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. People v. ArthurNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. People v. AlmesticaNew York Court of Appeals · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. ErmoNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. In re SchaeferNew York City Family Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API