Legal Opinion · Dissent

Banda-Ortiz v. Gonzales

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 28, 2006No. 04-61100Published

1DissentJerry E. Smith, Circuit Judge

The panel majority today unnecessarily creates a circuit split on an important issue of immigration law and ensures that a sizable number of aliens facing departure will be effectively unable to avail themselves of the statutory right to file one good-faith motion to reopen, regardless of the merit of their underlying claims. Because Congress could not possibly have intended this result, I respectfully dissent.

I

We are the fourth circuit to consider this precise question: Does a timely filed motion to reopen toll an alien’s voluntary departure period?1 We are the first to answer in the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Bocova v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API