Banda-Ortiz v. Gonzales
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1DissentJerry E. Smith, Circuit Judge
The panel majority today unnecessarily creates a circuit split on an important issue of immigration law and ensures that a sizable number of aliens facing departure will be effectively unable to avail themselves of the statutory right to file one good-faith motion to reopen, regardless of the merit of their underlying claims. Because Congress could not possibly have intended this result, I respectfully dissent.
I
We are the fourth circuit to consider this precise question: Does a timely filed motion to reopen toll an alien’s voluntary departure period?1 We are the first to answer in the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bocova v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.