Legal Opinion
Leinbach v. Dyatt
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided December 6, 1924No. 25,478; No. 25,479PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dawson, J.:
These appeals are a sequel to Leinbach v. Dyatt, 112 Kan. 782, 212 Pac. 894, some features of which must be rehearsed to get a clear understanding of the matters now presented.
On and before the beginning of the year 1919, J. B. Dyatt owned some 16,000 acres of land in Sherman county. The property was incumbered by a mortgage held by the North American Insurance Company for $125,000 or more, on which Dyatt had made default. The mortgagee brought suit in the federal court to foreclose, and on January 10, 1919, a decree was entered ordering…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Gillespie v. MoonNew York Court of Chancery · 1817
- Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- Sands v. CodwiseCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1808
- Railroad Company v. Soutter Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Loos v. . WilkinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rotge v. DunlapCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
- North American Life Insurance v. DyattSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
- Pearcy v. Bankers Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1929
- Consolidated American Royalty Corp. v. TaliaferroCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
- Tiger v. SellersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944