Legal Opinion

Pearcy v. Bankers Mortgage Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 9, 1929No. 28,980PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

The Bankers Mortgage Company has appealed from the judgment of the trial court holding that it was not a mortgagee in possession of the real property in controversy. Appellant also complains of the amount found to be due it on an accounting with the mortgagor and of other findings and holdings of the court incidental to its claim of being a mortgagee in possession.

In 1924 Glen J. Pearcy was the owner of certain lots in the city of Mankato. He erected thereon a building, one side of which was to be used as a hotel and the other side for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stouffer v. HarlanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  2. Kelso v. NortonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  3. Charpie v. StoutSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  4. Jaggar v. PlunkettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  5. Bankers Mortgage Co. v. RobsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bankers Mortgage Co. v. O'DonovanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  2. Sutor v. First National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  3. Leaverton v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API