Commonwealth v. Humphries
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1DissentSikora, J.
Respectfully I dissent from the reasoning and result advanced by my colleagues. For the following reasons, I conclude (1) that the evidence supported the jury’s verdict of guilt of constructive possession of marijuana with intent to distribute; and (2) that the admission of the drug analysis certification of marijuana constituted harmless error beyond a reasonable doubt.
1. Proof of constructive possession, a. Standards. In review *706of the denial of a motion for a directed finding of not guilty, the appellate court examines the entire evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth and…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Fahy v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.