Legal Opinion

F.D. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 7, 2007No. 4D06-791Published

1Per curiam

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we grant appointed counsel’s motion to withdraw in this appeal but write to correct a minor sentencing error that was identified by counsel in the Anders brief. The state filed a response to counsel’s motion which voiced no objection to the relief requested. Minor sentencing issues may be disposed of in an Anders proceeding where there is no objection from the state. See, e.g., Rashid v. State, 932 So.2d 1205 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006).

The amended disposition order in this case contained superfluous language…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. B.C. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  3. Rashid v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  4. BC v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API