Samuel Wymond Cooperage Co. v. Thompson
Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati
1Opinion of the Court
Wright, J.,
Jackson and Dempsey, JJ., concur.
The facts found at special term are in all respects sustained by the evidence: the court was right therefore, in its finding of a warranty, in its assessment of the amount of the damages, as well as in its determination that Thompson, defendant in error, had not in his treatment of | the barrels been negligent,
j Whiskey barrels manufactured by The Wymond Cooperage Company had, to the number of several thousand, been sold and delivered to John B. Thompson, a distiller, under a warranty that they were “of first class white oak timber thoroughly…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- District of Columbia v. ArmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- City of Fort Wayne v. CoombsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- McCormick v. . Pennsylvania Central R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Stockton Combined Harvester & Agricultural Works v. Glens Falls Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis Railway Co. v. WynantIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.