Legal Opinion

Preston-Parton Milling Co. v. Dexter Horton & Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1900No. 3326PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. William Hickman Mooee, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Reavis, J.

Suit to enjoin the redemption of real property in Seattle. The plaintiff filed its complaint in the superior court of King county, stating substantially the following facts: That on January 11, 1896, the defendant Dexter Horton & Co. recovered a judgment against W. A. Harrington and wife; that on March 19, 1896, the McDougall & Southwick Co. recovered a judgment against W. A. Harrington and wife; that on April 22, 1896, the plaintiff milling company recovered a judgment against *238the same defendants; that theretofore, on March 14, 1893,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Smith v. . ReidNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Wagner v. LawWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Bridgman & Co. v. McKissickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1863
  4. Taylor v. BranscombeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  5. Sawtelle v. WeymouthWashington Supreme Court · 1896

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Crandall v. LeeWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Erickson v. Grubb & Ellis Commercial Brokerage Co. (In Re Previs)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · 1983
  3. Coolidge v. ScheringWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Retail Clerks Welfare Trust v. McCarty (In re Van de Kamp's Dutch Bakeries)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. Gagne v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API