Legal Opinion

Bean v. State

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 2008No. DA 07-0049PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Morris

¶1 The State of Montana and the Montana Public Employee Retirement Administration (collectively State) appeal from two orders of the First Judicial District Court, Lewis and Clark County, concluding that § 19-13-210(2), MCA, violates the equal protection rights of Douglas L. Bean, et al. (Bean) under the Montana Constitution and awarding attorney fees and costs to Bean. We reverse.

*87FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶2 Senator Jon Tester introduced Senate Bill 289 (SB 289) at the 2001 Montana Legislative Session. Mont. Sen. 289, 57th Leg., Reg. Sess. (Jan. 22, 2001). SB 289 proposed amendments…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Powell v. State Compensation Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Gulbrandson v. CareyMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Arneson v. State Ex Rel. Department of AdministrationMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Farrier v. Teacher's Retirement BoardMontana Supreme Court · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gazelka v. St. Peter's Hosp.Montana Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Disability Rights Montana v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Estate of C.K.O. Minor ChildMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Wrzesien v. MPERAMontana Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Bean v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API