Legal Opinion
Farmers Production Credit Ass'n v. Johnson
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided June 11, 1986No. Nos. 84-1915 and 85-860PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLocher, J.
I
Case No. 84-1915
Farmers Production Credit Association v. Johnson
The primary issue facing the court in this appeal is whether the trial *73court abused its discretion in denying appellants’ motion for leave to file an amended answer under Civ. R. 15(A). We hold that the trial court did not abuse its discretion.
Our analysis must begin by recognizing that the grant or denial of leave to amend pleadings is within the sound discretion of the trial court. Civ. R. 15(A) reads as follows:
“A party may amend his pleading once as a matter of course at any time before a responsive pleading is served or, if…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
- Svoboda v. City of BrunswickOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Charles Stinson Smith and Jimmie Dean Smith v. Russellville Production Credit AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- DeLaigle v. Federal Land Bank of ColumbiaDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1983
- Spring Water Dairy, Inc. v. Federal Intermediate Credit BankDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Federal Land Bank of Saint Paul v. OverboeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Federal Land Bank of Saint Paul v. HalversonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- City of Dublin v. FriedmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- First Financial Servs. v. Cross Tabernacle, 06ap-404 (8-21-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. AeyOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.