Legal Opinion

Hamilton National Bank of Chattanooga v. Russell

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided August 8, 1966No. Civ. A. 4646PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRANK W. WILSON, District Judge.

This is an action upon a note wherein plaintiff seeks to bring defendants before the Court upon substituted service under the provisions of the Tennessee “Long Arm Statute”, Sections 20-235 et seq., Tennessee Code Annotated. The case is before the Court upon motions of the defendants to quash or set aside service of process and to dismiss for lack of in per-sonam jurisdiction.

The question is whether in personam jurisdiction over each of the defendants may be exercised by this Court consistent with the requirements of the Due Process Clause of the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Southern MacHine Company, Inc. v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
  2. Avdel Corporation v. MecureSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
  3. Sifers v. HorenMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Leeper v. LeeperSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
  5. Ventling v. KraftSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API