Legal Opinion

State v. Dankworth

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Decided July 26, 1995PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WHITE, Judge.

The state appeals pursuant to Rule 10 of the Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure alleging that the trial judge acted improperly when, as the thirteenth juror, he set aside the jury verdict in this case. We have reviewed the record on appeal and relevant authorities, and, for the reasons discussed below, we affirm the judgment of the trial court and remand the case for a new trial before a different trial judge.

Appellees, Wama Dankworth, Jeffrey Terry, and Jody Terry, were convicted by a jury of the digital penetration of a person less than 13 years of age. The record…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. State v. CabbageTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Liakas v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1956

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. MajorsTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. BrownCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  3. State v. GillonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
  4. Dennis Evans v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2018
  5. James Snipes v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2020

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API