Legal Opinion
Flatt Ex Rel. Flatt v. Kantak
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided September 3, 2004No. 20030285PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Josiah Flatt, by and through his natural guardians Anita and James Flatt, appealed from an order denying his motion for a new trial and from an amended judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding Dr. Sunita Kantak was not negligent in obtaining Anita Flatt’s informed consent for the circumcision of Josiah Flatt. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] James and Anita Flatt are the parents of Josiah Flatt, who was born on March 6, 1997, at Meritcare Hospital in Fargo. On March 7, 1997, Dr. Kantak performed a circumcision on Josiah Flatt. Josiah Flatt’s medical records, which were *211sig…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Linda R. S. v. Richard D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Schlesinger v. Reservists Committee to Stop the WarSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Linda RS v. Richard D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Orr v. OrrSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- White v. LeimbachOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- Feland v. P.F.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Whitecalfe v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- M.M. v. Fargo Public School District No. 1North Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Clark v. ClarkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.