In the Interest of R. S. H.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Mikell, Judge.
Appellant mother appeals the termination of her parental rights to R. S. H., F. V. H. and D. M. H. She argues that the juvenile court erred in finding clear and convincing evidence that her parental rights have been lost. We affirm.
In considering a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence supporting an order terminating parental rights, this Court is required to view the evidence in the light most favorable to the appellee, here the [Screven County Department of Family and Children Services (the “Department”)], and determine whether any rational trier of fact could have…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In the Interest of R. N.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- In the Interest of D. I. W.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- In the Interest of S. L. B.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- In the Interest of D. S.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- In the Interest of D. L. D.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In the Interest of L. G.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- In the Interest of T. A. M.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- In the Interest of D. B. C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- In the Interest of R. D. B.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- In the Interest of J. J.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.