Legal Opinion

Reece v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 11, 1951No. 17462PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, Presiding Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) As to whether females are qualified to serve on' traverse juries, aid in answering this question would be found in article 6, section 16, paragraph 2 of the Constitution of 1945 (Code, Ann., § 2-5102); Code §§ 59-106, 59-112, 79-207, 102-102; also Pollard v. State, 148 Ga. 447 (96 S. E. 997); Powers v. State, 172 Ga. 1 (4) (157 S. E. 195); Cady v. State, 198 Ga. 99, 102 (b) (31 S. E. 2d, 38). But a determination of this question will not here be made. Even though it be conceded that a challenge to the array would be a proper…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  2. Powers v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  3. Geer v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  4. Cady v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  5. Surles v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. DePalma v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
  2. Mendel v. PinkardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  3. Jester v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  4. Reece v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  5. Teague v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API