Legal Opinion

Adams v. City of Redding

District Court, E.D. California

Decided May 18, 2021No. 2:20-cv-01610Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CINDY ADAMS, individually and as No. 2:20-cv-01610-TLN-DMC Personal Representative to the Estate of 12 JESSE ADAMS, 13 Plaintiff, ORDER 14 v. 15 CITY OF REDDING; KYLE CORRIGAN, 16 CHRISTOPHER STAUP, EDWARD MCGINNIS, and DOES 4 through 10, 17 Defendants. 18 19 20 This matter is before the Court on Defendant City of Redding’s (“Defendant”) Motion to 21 Dismiss.1 (ECF No. 22.) Plaintiff Cindy Adams (“Plaintiff”) opposed Defendant’s motion. 22 (ECF No. 23.) Defendant filed a Reply. (ECF No. 24.) For the reasons…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API