Legal Opinion
United States v. Daniel Sandoval-Vasquez
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided January 26, 2006No. 03-1238PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.
After the district court denied his motion to suppress evidence police officers obtained after entering his business, Daniel Sandoval-Vasquez entered a conditional guilty plea to possessing, with the intent to distribute, over five kilograms of cocaine. He now appeals the denial of his motion to suppress and raises challenges to his sentence. We agree with the district court that the officers’ entry into his open business did not violate the Fourth Amendment, and we do not find the district court’s finding that Sandoval-Vasquez consented to the officers’ subsequent…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Anita Christensen and Robert Alty v. County of Boone, Illinois, and Edward KriegerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Panaigua-VerdugoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Figueroa-EspanaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Gentry v. SevierCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- United States v. EmersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.