Legal Opinion

Lankford v. Nicholson Manufacturing Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 1994No. 20437PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SILAK, Justice.

BACKGROUND

Appellant Garland Lankford (Lankford) was seriously injured when he was struck by a log while working at the Boise Cascade Mill in Emmett, Idaho. The log was being debarked by a machine manufactured by respondent Nicholson Manufacturing Company (Nicholson). Ordinarily, the debarker is fed logs by an in-feed conveyor. As a log enters the debarker, “hold down” rolls apply several tons of pressure to the log, holding it secure so that the debarker can effectively scrape the bark from the log by means of a rotating ring of blades. On occasion, the spinning blade ring can…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sun Valley Shopping Center, Inc. v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Koch v. ElkinsIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Sherwood v. CarterIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Baldner v. Bennett's, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Workman Family Partnership v. City of Twin FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. Boise Cascade Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Gunter v. Murphy's Lounge, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Morris by and Through Morris v. ThomsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Brady v. City of HomedaleIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. PoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API