Ozeas v. Johnson

4 U.S. 434 (____)

4 Dall. 434

Ozeas

versus

Johnson, Administrator of Foulke.

Supreme Court of United States.

Hopkinson, for the defendant.

TILGHMAN, C.J.

It was my wish to support the action, if possible; because the jury have decided on the merits of the cause. But, upon a deliberate consideration of the nature of the action, and the authorities which have been cited, I am convinced that the plaintiff cannot recover. Money received by one partner, during the partnership, is not received for the use of either, but for the use of both, the partners. All that either partner is entitled to, is a moiety…