Danielson v. Northwestern Fuel Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota
At Law. Action by Karl Danielson against the Northwestern Fuel Company. Hearing on motion to quash an execution.
1Opinion of the Court
NELSON, District Judge,
(after stating the facts.) No execution could issue until a final judgment is rendered. The judgment became final at the time when the motion for a new trial was determined. See Woods v. Lindvall, 48 Fed. Rep. 73, 1 C. C. A. 34.
Although the order denying the motion for a new trial was signed by the judge in vacation, and at chambers, upon January 18, 1893, it was not effective, so that the judgment became final, until the order was filed of record in the clerk’s office in the division in which the judgment was entered, which was on January 21, 1893.
Under section 1007,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kitchen v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Doyle v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Danville v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
3Cited by2 opinions
- Van Huss v. LandsbergDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1967
- McMillan v. McMillanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933