Doyle v. Wisconsin
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court
Me. Cheep Justice Waite
delivered the opinion of the court.
The claim on the part of the plaintiff in error is, that as a writ of error to operate as a supersedeas might issue from this court to re-examine the judgment of the court below, a writ to carry the judgment into effect could not issue from the State court until the expiration of ten days after the rendition of the judgment. Whether this' is so or not depends upon the effect to be given to that clause in sect. 1007, Revised Statutes, which, as amended by the act of Feb. 18, 1875, 18 Stat., part 3, p. 316, reads as follows: “And in such…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Board of Commissioners v. GormanSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
3Cited by11 opinions
- Daggs v. Orient InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
- Foster v. Kansas Ex Rel. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- State ex rel. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. VandiverSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- Hand v. CookNevada Supreme Court · 1907
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.