Legal Opinion

(PC) Thomas v. Davey

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 3, 2020No. 1:19-cv-00333Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL THOMAS, ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-00333-NONE-SAB (PC) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 13 v. ) MOTION TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT, AND EXTENDING THE DISCOVERY AND 14 DAVID DAVEY, et.al., ) DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINES ) 15 Defendants. ) (ECF No. 38) ) 16 ) ) 17 ) 18 Plaintiff Michael Thomas is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 19 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to amended, along with a copy of the proposed 21 amended…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mladen Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Amerisourcebergen Corporation v. Dialysist West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  3. John Crowley v. Bruce BannisterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. Wakefield v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. Gillespie v. CivilettiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API