Legal Opinion

Smith v. Interior Warehouse Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1908PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From Wheeler: Henry J. Bean, Judge. This is a suit by E. L. Smith against the Interior Warehouse Co. to reform two contracts for the sale of 27,500 sacks of wheat by plaintiff to the defendant. From a judgment in favor of defendant, plaintiff appeals. The case was submitted on briefs, under the proviso of Rule 16: 50 Or. 580.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Eakin

This is a suit to reform two contracts. On September 8, 1904, plaintiff and defendant, by its agent, A. L. Knight, made an agreement as to the sale of a large amount of wheat by Smith to the defendant, the terms of which sale Knight attempted to embody in a printed form used by defendant in such purchases. The same was signed by the plaintiff, and is in the following words, viz.:

*579“Buyer’s Copy (forwarded to Portland Office). Grain rioTvfll,Sl (*'f"

Pendleton, Or., Sept. 8, 1904.

I have today sold to the Interior Warehouse Company for delivery on, or before, Nov. 1, 1904, twenty-seven thousand…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stein v. PhillipsOregon Supreme Court · 1906
  2. King v. HolbrookOregon Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Dolph v. Lennon's, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Interior Warehouse Co. v. DunnOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Howard v. TettelbaumOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Boardman v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Hughey v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1913

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API