Legal Opinion

Ball v. Park MGM Casino, LLC

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided March 3, 2025No. 2:24-cv-01753Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 6 WILLIAM H. BALL, Case No. 2:24-cv-01753-CDS-NJK 7 Plaintiff(s), REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 8 v. 9 PARK MGM CASINO, LLC, 10 Defendant(s). 11 Plaintiff has failed to update his address. See Docket Nos. 13, 14. “A party, not the district 12 court, bears the burden of keeping the court apprised of any changes in [her] mailing address.” 13 Carey v. King,

856 F.2d 1439, 1441

(9th Cir. 1988) (per curiam); see also In re Hammer,

940 F.2d 14 524, 526

(9th Cir. 1991). To that end, the local rules require that litigants immediately file written 15…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gregory Carey v. John E. KingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  2. United States v. Richard M. PentaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API