Legal Opinion

Ladner v. Bowles

Emergency Court of Appeals

Decided May 12, 1944No. 109PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAGRUDER, Judge.

In October, 1941, complainant bought a brick apartment building in Tulsa, Oklahoma. His rentals became subject to Maximum Rent Regulation No. 45 for the Tulsa Defense-Rental Area. This regulation was issued August 20, 1942, to become effective September 1, 1942, and established March 1, 1942, as the rent freezing date. 7 F.R. 6641.1 Pursuant to adjustment provisions contained in the regulation, complainant petitioned for increases in the maximum rents with respect to three of the four apartment units in the building. These petitions were denied by orders of the area rent…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Northwood Apartments, Inc. v. BrownEmergency Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. Gale Realty Corp. v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. Patrick Cudahy Family Co. v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1943
  4. Smith v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1944

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jacob Goodman & Co. v. PorterEmergency Court of Appeals · 1946
  2. Rosen v. PowersDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. Woods v. LevineDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API