Depaola v. Cummins Diesel Engines of Connecticut
Connecticut Superior Court
1Opinion of the CourtTroland, J.
The essence of the fourth defense is that if on September 12, 1957, as alleged in the complaint, the plaintiff was an employee of T. A. D. Jones and Company, Inc., and on said day was directed by his said employer to assist the agents and employees of the defendant Cummins Diesel Engines of Connecticut in the repair of a diesel engine then on the premises of said T. A. D. Jones and Company, Inc., and if while so engaged plaintiff was subject to the instructions, direction and control of said agents of the defendant Cummins Diesel Engines of Connecticut, as alleged in the complaint, then the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lucarelli v. Earle C. Dodds, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gregory v. Garrett Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983