Legal Opinion

Depaola v. Cummins Diesel Engines of Connecticut

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided July 11, 1960No. File 88731PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtTroland, J.

The essence of the fourth defense is that if on September 12, 1957, as alleged in the complaint, the plaintiff was an employee of T. A. D. Jones and Company, Inc., and on said day was directed by his said employer to assist the agents and employees of the defendant Cummins Diesel Engines of Connecticut in the repair of a diesel engine then on the premises of said T. A. D. Jones and Company, Inc., and if while so engaged plaintiff was subject to the instructions, direction and control of said agents of the defendant Cummins Diesel Engines of Connecticut, as alleged in the complaint, then the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lucarelli v. Earle C. Dodds, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gregory v. Garrett Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API