Legal Opinion

Briant v. McGown

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 13, 1929No. 7322PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCLENDON, C. j.

Tbe controlling question in this case involves the proper construction of item 22 in the 1925 codicil to the will of J*. D. Sugg, deceased, under which appellee Mrs. Nettie McGown and her children were given all of Sugg’s stock in the Accidental Oil Mills. At the time the codicil was written, the testator had advanced over $200,000 to the oil mill, which was in excess of the value of its assets; and the question presented is whether the legatees took the stock freed from or charged with the amount of these advances as an indebtedness against the cor•poration.

The suit was by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. American Refining Co. v. StaplesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  2. American Refining Co. v. StaplesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ellet v. McCordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  2. Lane v. SherrillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Brady v. NicholsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  4. Federal Land Bank of Houston v. LittleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  5. Long v. LongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API