Legal Opinion

State v. Emmanuel

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1953No. 32241Published

1Opinion of the Court

42 Wn.2d 799 (1953)

259 P.2d 845

THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent,

v.

SAMUEL EMMANUEL, Appellant.[1]

No. 32241.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

July 2, 1953.

Don G. Abel, Lee Olwell, Rummens, Griffin & Short, and Paul R. Cressman, for appellant.

John Panesko and Alfred McBee, Special Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

DONWORTH, J.

The defendant was charged by information, in three counts, with the crime of bribery in violation of RCW 9.18.020 (cf. Rem. Rev. Stat., § 2321). The jury returned a verdict of guilty on all three counts. He then moved for a new trial, and the motion was…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. State v. EmmanuelWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. State v. MeyerWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  3. State v. CrankUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  4. State v. WappensteinWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  5. State v. EmmanuelWashington Supreme Court · 1953

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API