Newingham v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
Eddie E. Newingham appeals his designation as a sexual predator based solely upon his criminal conviction pursuant to section 775.21(4)(a)(l)(a), Florida Statutes. Newingham contends that the statute is unconstitutional because it violates the right to procedural due process. We affirm because we have held the statute constitutional. Metaxotos v. State, 876 So.2d 1261 (Fla. 4th DCA July 7, 2004); Johnson v. State, 875 So.2d 1281 (Fla. 5th DCA July 2, 2004); Martin v. State, 864 So.2d 589 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); Miller v. State, 861 So.2d 1283 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). As we have done previously, we…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Espindola v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Martin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Miller v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Metaxotos v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
3Cited by1 opinion
- Seminole County v. KoziaraDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004