Legal Opinion
Miller v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided January 2, 2004No. 5D02-1821PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
861 So.2d 1283 (2004)
Michael H. MILLER, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D02-1821.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
January 2, 2004.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Brynn Newton, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ann M. Phillips, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
2Per curiam
We affirm Michael H. Miller's conviction of sexual battery on a child under the age of twelve. We also affirm the trial court's order declaring Miller to be a sexual predator. See Milks v. State, 848…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Espindola v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Milks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Reyes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Nielsen v. JoannouDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
4Cited by9 opinions
- Hannah v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Martin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Rickman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Nielsen v. JoannouDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.