Legal Opinion

Larrowe-Loisette v. O'Loughlin

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided June 22, 1898PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TOWNSEND, District Judge.

The complainant herein, being the widow, executrix, and sole beneficiary under the will of Alphonse Loisette, in September, 1896, duly copyrighted a work entitled “As-similative Memory; or How to Attend and Never Forget,” — of which work her late husband was the author. She brings this bill to restrain the defendants from selling a work entitled — “Memory: A Scientific Practical Method of Cultivating the Faculties of Attention, Recollection, and Retention. By A. Loisette,” — published and sold by defendants during the years 1895 and 1896, and advertised as a system…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jewelers' Mercantile Agency v. Jewelers' Weekly Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. Jewellers' Mercantile Agency, Ltd. v. Jewellers' Weekly Pub. Co.New York Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Werckmeister v. American Lithographic Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1904
  2. Waring v. WDAS Broadcasting Station, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. RCA Mfg. Co. v. WhitemanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  4. Continental Casualty Company v. BeardsleyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
  5. White v. KimmellDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API