Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. ROFFLER

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 22, 2010No. 1090007Published

1ConcurrenceStuart, Justice

In addition to concluding that the indictments were legally insufficient, the trial court concluded that a fatal variance existed between the indictments and the evidence proffered by the State. The Court of Criminal Appeals also reached this conclusion. In support of its dismissal of the indictments, the trial court cited Delevie v. State, 686 So.2d 1283 (Ala.Crim.App.1996), which holds that an indictment is fatally defective when it alleges that a defendant stole a certain amount of United States *232currency, but the evidence adduced at trial established that a check in the amount was stolen.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte AirhartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Ex Parte BrooksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  3. Shubert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  4. Delevie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  5. Harrison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API