Legal Opinion

Rassi v. Trunkline Gas Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1968No. 1067S95PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHunter, J.

Appellee, a natural gas company, brought a series of nine separate eminent domain actions to appropriate easements over certain lands for a right-of-way to construct, operate and maintain a pipeline. By agreement of the parties, these nine actions were consoli*4dated “for the purposes of pre-trial conference and trial.” Subsequently, the trial court entered nine separate orders of condemnation. The only complaint and order of condemnation in the transcript before this Court are those filed in the trial court against appellants Myron R. Rassi and Mary Joanne Rassi.

Indiana Supreme Court Rule 2-7…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kohl v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. United States v. CarmackSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Rindge Co. v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Joslin Manufacturing Co. v. City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hunter v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Whittaker v. County of LawrenceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Lake Central School Corp. v. Hawk Development Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Sales v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Reel Pipe & Valve Co. v. Consolidated City of Indianapolis-Marion CountyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API