Legal Opinion
Sales v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided July 7, 1999No. 08A02-9806-CR-515PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NAJAM, Judge
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Mark Sales brings this permissive interlocutory appeal pursuant to Indiana Appellate Rule 4(B)(6) from the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress. The State charged Sales with three counts of operating a vehicle while intoxicated, as Class C and Class A misdemeanors. Sales filed a motion to suppress which alleged that the results of his Intoxilyzer 5000 breath test are inadmissible as evidence because the instrument used to conduct the test does not meet the selection criteria established by the Department of Toxicology under Title 260, Rule 1.1…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Taylor v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. Moss-DwyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Grody v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
- Grody v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
- WOERNER, ETC. v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1961
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sales v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Sales v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Bolden v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Carter v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Hancock v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.