Legal Opinion

Dannheim Development, Inc. v. Mogler

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 22, 1987No. C1-87-502PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIERENGARTEN, Judge.

Dannheim Development, Inc. appeals from a February 19, 1987 order vacating a January 29 preliminary attachment order and claims the trial court erred because respondent Maynard Mogler’s sale of his one-third partnership interests in Bridge Street Partnership and Bridge Street Limited Partnership, and the subsequent assignment of the proceeds of the sale to the State Bank of Darfur, was made with an intent to delay or defraud his creditors. We affirm.

FACTS

On August 1, 1975, Emmett Erpelding and respondent Maynard Mogler signed a partnership agreement forming Bridge…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Crookston State Bank v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  2. Reiling v. WoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  3. Kuske v. JevneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  4. Larson v. SollerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  5. Sweeney v. McMahonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kranz v. KoenigDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
  2. In Re the Revocable Trust of MargolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API