Legal Opinion
Kuske v. Jevne
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 17, 1928No. 26,592PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
Plaintiff appeals from an order vacating a writ of attachment and the levy- thereunder.
On the showing made before the trial court there was dispute as to some of the facts, and the facts that were undisputed were such that different inferences and conclusions could reasonably be drawn therefrom. In that situation the rule announced in First State Bank v. Schatz, 104 Minn. 425, 116 N. W. 917, applies.
Affirmed.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- First State Bank v. SchatzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dannheim Development, Inc. v. MoglerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Hereford Farms Co., Inc. v. LendeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928