Legal Opinion

Ayers v. Philadelphia Housing Authority

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 30, 1990No. 89-1632PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

GARTH, Circuit Judge:

This case requires us to answer the following questions: (1) does Federal law preempt the application of Pennsylvania’s regulations prescribing requirements and regulations for foreclosure and default notice before occupants of federally funded Turnkey III housing program may be removed from their residences? and if not, (2) did the Philadelphia Housing Authority (PHA) violate the procedural due process rights of Turnkey III homebuyers by failing to adhere to the requirements of Pennsylvania Act 6 (41 Pa.S.A. § 101 et seq.) and Pennsylvania Act 91 (35…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  4. Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Nina Michael v. Shiley, Inc. Hospital Products Group, Inc., (Formerly Howmedica, Inc.) Pfizer, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  2. Maglies v. Estate of GuySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
  3. Stevenson v. San Francisco Housing AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. American Express Travel Related Services Co. v. Sidamon-EristoffDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2011
  5. University of Maryland at Baltimore v. Peat Marwick Main & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API