Legal Opinion

In re First National Bank

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1899PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Motion for mandamus to compel inspection of books.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.

In May, 1892, John Howard, the owner of certificate No. 29, for fifty shares of the capital stock of William A. Miles & Go., a domestic corporation, being indebted to one Frank Seaman, indorsed the said certificate to the First National Bank of the City of Brooklyn, to secure it for moneys advanced and to be advanced by it to said Seaman. Such advances now amount to about $10,000. No transfer of the stock has ever been made on the books of the company; Seaman is insolvent, and Howard died March 6, 1899. The bank applied to the corporation to be allowed to examine its books to ascertain, among…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of SteinwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. Rosevelt v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1854

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cheatham v. Wheeling & L. E. Ry. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1930
  2. Ramco Operating Co. v. GassettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  3. In re GillNew York Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Ramco Operating Co. v. GassettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API